Literature review

EXPERTISE CRITERIA FOR THE BENEFIT OF CONTINUED PROVISION OF THE ORGANIC LAW OF SOCIAL ASSISTANCE (LOAS)

How to cite: Spina VL, Silva ER, Leal LPFF, Borracini JA, Panza FT. Critérios Periciais do Benefício de Prestação Continuada da Lei Orgânica da Assistência Social (LOAS). Persp Med Legal Pericias Med. 2018, 3(3).

https://dx.doi.org/ 10.47005/030303
→ You are reading an abstract. Please click here and choose language to access the full article translated by Google.

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

CRITÉRIOS PERICIAIS DO BENEFÍCIO DE PRESTAÇÃO CONTINUADA DA LEI ORGÂNICA DA ASSISTÊNCIA SOCIAL (LOAS)

Viviam Paula Lucianelli Spina (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/8042791240784011 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9196-3061

Elcio Rodrigues da Silva (1)

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1847-1009

Lucas Pedroso Fernandes Ferreira Leal (2)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4910203611295452 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8500-9180

Jonas Aparecido Borracini (1)

ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1531-5235

Fabio Tadeu Panza (2)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/5528930004210470 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7841-7461

(1) Médico Perito Oficial do Juizado Especial Federal de São Paulo (JEF-SP) e do Instituto de Medicina Social e de Criminologia do Estado de São Paulo (IMESC). (Main Author)

(2) Médico Perito Oficial do Instituto de Medicina Social e de Criminologia do Estado de São Paulo (IMESC). (Main Author)

E-mail: viviamspina@hotmail.com

ABSTRACT

Social assistance is a right of the citizen and duty of the State. The benefit of continued provision is given to the disabled person who does not have the means to provide for their maintenance. The person with a disability is one who has a long-term physical, mental, intellectual or sensorial disability, which, in interaction with one or more barriers, may obstruct their full and effective participation in society on an equal basis with others. The granting of this benefit is subject to medical evaluation and social evaluation by experts at INSS (National Institute of Social Security). Administrative refusals generate judicial litigation, and the magistrate requests the expert evidence to form his conviction. Thus, it is imperative to standardize concepts and technical criteria used in judicial expert assessment to comply with the pertinent legislation of the benefit of continued provision.

Keywords: social assistance, impairment, disability, expertise, judicial,

Please click here for the full article in portuguese.

Bibliographical references

  1. Lei nº 8.742, de 7 de dezembro de 1993. Brasília; 1996
  2. Brasil, lei nº. 12.435, de 6 de julho de 2011.Sistema Único. Brasília, 2011.
  3. Decreto nº 7.617, de 17 de novembro de 2011. Brasília, 2011.
  4. World Heatlh Organization. International Classification of Functioning Disability and Health (ICF); Maio, 2001
  5. Decreto nº 3.298, de 20 de dezembro de 1999. Regulamenta a Lei nº 7.853, de 24 de outubro de 1989, dispõe sobre a Política Nacional para a Integração da Pessoa Portadora de Deficiência, consolida as normas de proteção, e dá outras providências.Diário Oficial da União, Brasília ;1999.
  6. Decreto nº 5.296, de 2 de dezembro de 2004.Regulamenta as Leis, n. 10.048. Diário Oficial da União, Brasília ; 2004
  7. Lei nº 13.146, de 6 de julho de 2015.Diário Oficial da União, Brasília; 2015.

Tags: