The author declares there is no conflict of interests.
Heron Ricardo Xavier Teixeira (1)
http://lattes.cnpq.br/8686691170340524.– https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3256-8488.
(1) Faculdade da Saúde e Ecologia Humana: Faculdade de Medicina, Vespasiano-MG, Brasil. (main author)
E-mail: heronrxteixeira@hotmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Estimating the time of death is an important task in day-to-day forensic work and many factors for its designation are understood, one of which is rigor mortis. They can be altered by extrinsic and intrinsic factors, such as temperature location, humidity, heat, age, sex, length and body weight, and can be used as a parameter for approximate identification of the time of death. Objective: To carry out a brief review on the topic in order to promote a better understanding of the subject addressed and fully understand its physiology. Materials and Methods: Pubmed, Scielo and Medline databases were searched without date restrictions for articles published in English and Portuguese using the descriptors rigor mortis, autolysis and changes after death. Results: The theme presents consolidated researches regarding its natural course, being an important tool to estimate the time of death along other signs that appear after death, as well as to estimate some causes of death. Conclusion: Understanding the development of rigor mortis, helps to identify and distinguish processes that may have led to death and the post-mortem time.
Keywords: Rigor Mortis, Autolysis, Changes Postmortem.
Bibliographical references
1. Ademir Fraco, Solon Diego Santos Carvalho Mendes, Fernando Fortes Picoli, Livia Graziele Rodrigues, Rhonan Ferreira Silva. Forensic thanatology and the pink tooth phenomenon: From the lack of relation with the cause of death to a potential evidence of cadaveric decomposition in dental autopsies — Case series.
Forensic Science International [Internet] 2018 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 291:8-12. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.08.011.
2. George AA, Kimberley Molina D. The Frequency of Truly Unknown/Undetermined Deaths: A Review of 452 Cases Over a 5-Year Period. Am J Forensic Med Pathol [Internet]. 2015 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 36(4):298-300. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1097/PAF.0000000000000181.
3. Pazin-Filho A. Morte: considerações para a prática médica. Medicina (Ribeirão Preto) [Internet]. 2005 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 38(1):20-5. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2176-7262.v38i1p20-25.
4. Garrido Rodrigo Grazinoli, Naia Maria João Teixeira. Cronotanatogenese: A influência do clima tropical na determinação do intervalos post-mortem. Lex Humana [Internet]. 2014 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 6(1):180-195.
5. Hall John E. Tratado de Fisiologia Médica 12a ed. Rio de Janeiro; Elsevier; 2011.
6. Mesri M, Behzadnia M, Dorooshi G. Accelerated rigor mortis: A case letter. J Res Med Sci [Internet] 2017 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021];22:126. Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.4103%2Fjrms.JRMS_599_17.
7. Madea B. Methods for determining time of death. Forensic Sci Med Pathol [Internet]. 2016 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021];12:451–485. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-016-9776-y.
8. Gonçalves NJ. Livor Mortis na Prática Médico-Legal. Persp Med Legal Pericias Med [Internet] 2019 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 4:1 Disponível em: https://dx.doi.org/10.47005/040103.
9. Pekka S, Knight B. KNIGHT’S Forensic Pathology 4a ed. Boca Raton; CRC Press; 2015
10. Crostack C, Sehner S, Raupach T, Anders S. Re-establishment of rigor mortis: evidence for a considerably longer post-mortem time span. International Journal of Legal Medicine [Internet] 2017 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021];1039-1042. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-017-1558-x.
11. Croce D, Croce Jr D. Manual de Medicina Legal. 8a ed. São Paulo; Saraiva; 2012
12. Anders S, Kunz M, Gehl A, Sehner S, Raupach T, Hans-Peter B. Estimation of the time since death – reconsidering the re-establishment of rigor mortis. Int J Legal Med [Internet] 2011 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 127:127-130. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-011-0632-z.
13. Henssge C, Madea B, Gallenkemper E. Death time estimation in case work. II. Integration of different methods. Forensic Science International [Internet] 1988 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 39:77-87. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-0738(88)90120-X.
14. Krompecher T, Gilles A, Brandt-Casadevall C, Mangin P. Experimental evaluation of rigor mortis IX. The influence of the breaking (mechanical solution) on the development of rigor mortis. Forensic Science International [Internet] 2007 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 176:157-162. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2007.08.004.
15. Tsokos M, Byard R. W. Putrefactive “rigor mortis”. Forensic Sci Med Pathol [Internet] 2011 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 8:200-201. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-011-9232-y.
16. Meilia PDI, Freeman MD, Herkutanto, Zeegers MP. A review of the diversity in taxonomy, definitions, scope, and roles in forensic medicine: implications for evidence-based practice. Forensic Sci Med Pathol [Internet] 2018 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 14(4):460-468. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12024-018-0031-6.
17. Pollanen MS. Deciding the cause of death after autopsy–revisited. J Clin Forensic Med [Internet] 2005 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021];12(3):113-21. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.02.004.
18. Henssge C, Madea B. Estimation of the time since death. Forensic Sci Int [Internet] 2007 [Citado 8 de Janero de 2021]; 165(2-3):182-4. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2006.05.017.
19. Hubig M, Muggenthaler H, Sinicina I, Mall G. Temperature based forensic death time estimation: The standard model in experimental test. Leg Med (Tokyo) [Internet] 2015 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021];17(5):381-7. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.05.005.
20. Belsey SL, Flanagan RJ. Postmortem biochemistry: Current applications. J Forensic Leg Med [Internet] 2016 [Citado 8 de Janeiro de 2021]; 41:49-57. Disponível em: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2016.04.011.
