The authors inform there is no conflict of interest.
A NECESSIDADE DE AVALIAÇÃO DO DANO ESTÉTICO TEMPORÁRIO NO ÂMBITO CIVIL BRASILEIRO
Maria Cecília Hessel Lopes (1)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-0486
Renata Yumi Lima Konichi (2)
http://lattes.cnpq.br/0287972168845427 – https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-1368
Duarte Nuno Vieira (3)
https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7366-6765
(1) Instituto de Medicina Social e de Criminologia de São Paulo, Diretora Técnica de Saúde I – Centro de Perícias, São Paulo/SP, Brasil (autor principal).
(2) Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo/SP, Brasil (autor secundário, revisão bibliográfica)
(3) Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Coimbra, Professor Catedrático, Coimbra, Portugal (coordenador e orientador)
E-mail: hesselmcecilia.perita@gmail.com, reyumik@gmail.com e dnvieira.pt@gmail.com
ABSTRACT
Introduction: The valuation of aesthetic damage is a difficult procedure that requires great skill from medical examiners, since victims may have gone through a period of psychological suffering that needs to be considered even if he/she does not present scars or permanent damage at the time of the evaluation. Materials and methods: A literature review on the subject was conducted based on international bibliographies related to the subject. Result: It was observed that there is a gap in the Brazilian literature on temporary aesthetic damage. Discussion: The aim of this study was to address the temporary aesthetic damage and the debate on its characterization and valuation for due financial compensation in Brazilian literature. Thus, this type of damage, in most cases, is underestimated and is not considered at the time of assessment. Conclusion: The assessment of temporary aesthetic damage can include the psychological suffering of the victim; its valuation will be expressed through a quantitative scale of seven degrees of increasing severity (1/7 to 7/7 – Thierry and Nicourt Method) following the example of what happens with permanent aesthetic damage. The characterization of the temporary aesthetic damage and the attribution of its valuation need adequate justification.
Keywords: Temporary aesthetic damage; Civil responsibility; Repair.
Bibliographical references
1. Franchitto N, Telmon N, Grolleau JL, Gavarri L, Laguerre J, Rougé D. Medicolegal evaluation of aesthetic impairment: particularities of post-burn scars. Burns. 2009 Aug;35(5):642-9. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2008.09.003. Epub 2009 Jan 23.
2. Barat I, Baccino, É. Le préjudice esthétique temporaire. L’expert devancé par le juge judiciaire…. La Ver. de Méd. Légale. 2010;1(1):2-7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.medleg.2010.02.001.
3. Latruffe C, Duffrin M. Le rapport du kinésithérapeute expert: la clé d’une indemnisation juste pour la victime: étude du cas «Martine». Kinésithérapie, la Revue. 2016;16:29-34.
4. França. Dossier Législatif: Loi de financement de la Sécurité Sociale du 21 décembre 2006. [acesso em 11 de julho de 2022]. Disponível em: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/loda/id/JORFTEXT000000817095/.
5. Leal LPFF, Silva ER, Spina VPL, Borracini JA, Panza FT. Valoração Médico-Pericial do Dano Estético. Saúde Ética & Justiça. 2017;22(1):41-9. https://doi.org/10.11606/issn.2317-2770.v22i1p41-49
6. Magalhães T, Duarte NV. Recomendações gerais para a realização de relatórios periciais de clínica forense no âmbito do Direito Civil. Rev. Port. Dano Corporal. 2010(20):79-90.
7. Costagliola R, Campana JP, Costagliola M. Brûlologie et médecine légale: les victimes d’incendie. Ann Burns Fire Disasters. 2016 Dec 31;29(4):289-94. French.
8. Couplet E. Le préjudice esthétique: définition, évaluation et réparation de ce préjudice particulier. Faculté de droit et de criminologie, Université catholique de Louvain, 2017. Prom.: De Coninck, Bertrand. [Acesso em 10 de julho de 2022]. Disponível em: http://hdl.handle.net/2078.1/thesis:8677.
9. Cobo Plana JA. La valoración del daños a la personas por accidentes de tráfico. Barcelona: Bosch; 2010.
10. Fernandes MM, Cobo Plana JA, Bouchardet FCH, Michel-Crosato E, Oliveira RN. Validação de instrumento para análise do dano estético no Brasil. Saúde em Debate. 2016:40(108):118-30. https://doi.org/10.1590/0103-1104-20161080010
11. Bouchardet FCH, Vieira SLG, Miranda GE, Fernandes MM, Vieira DNP, Silva RF. Valoração do dano estético nos acórdãos do Tribunal de Justiça de Minas Gerais. ROBRAC. 2013;22(63):116-9.
12. J CP. La valoração del daños a la personas por accidentes de tráfico. 1st ed. Barcelona: Editorial Bosch; 2010.
