Original Article

VALUATION OF AESTHETIC DAMAGE IN THE SCOPE OF BRAZILIAN CIVIL LAW

How to cite: Konichi RYL, Fujisawa RK, Miziara ID. Valuation of aesthetic damage in the scope of brazilian civil law. Persp Med Legal Pericia Med. 2023; 8: e230516

https://dx.doi.org/10.47005/230516

The authors inform there is no conflict of interest.

VALORAÇÃO DO DANO ESTÉTICO NO ÂMBITO DO DIREITO CIVIL BRASILEIRO

Renata Yumi Lima Konichi (1)

http://lattes.cnpq.br/0287972168845427https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5882-1368

Raísa Kyn Fujisawa (2)

http://lattes.cnpq.br/1576287532511418https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6194-3625

Ivan Dieb Miziara (3)

http://lattes.cnpq.br/123456789123https://orcid.org/0000-1234-5678-9101

(1) Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo/SP, Brasil (autor principal)

(2) Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo/SP, Brasil (autor secundário)

(3) Hospital das Clínicas da Universidade de São Paulo, Departamento de Medicina Legal, Bioética, Medicina do Trabalho e Medicina Física e Reabilitação Faculdade de Medicina da USP, São Paulo/SP, Brasil (orientador)

E-mail: reyumik@gmail.com

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Aesthetic damage has gained special relevance in recent decades, due to the appreciation of themes related to image and body harmony. The assessment of this damage continues to be quite imprecise, because it is an objectionable damage by the observer, measurable and valuable, however it has a large subjective component, both on the part of the subject who suffers from it, and on the part of the examiner. This article aims to present the current scenario in aesthetic damage valuation and to propose a new method for this purpose. Method: Bibliographic review of open access articles up to the year 2022, in Portuguese, Spanish and English. Results: None of the existing methodologies proved to be sufficient to approach the real assessment of the damage that the aesthetic damage caused to the victims’ lives, none of the analyzed scales simultaneously evaluated the inherent characteristics of the lesion, the impacts on functionality and the psycho-emotional consequences. Discussion: In Brazil, there are no definitive criteria for evaluating aesthetic damage. Currently, in order to reference and qualify the aesthetic damage, in addition to the detailed description of the condition, it is proposed to use an evaluative scale, the “gradual scale with seven degrees”, which is considered the most subjective method among the others. The difficulty of this assessment is a consensus in the literature and the real repercussions of aesthetic damage cannot be addressed by current methods, preventing the judge from awarding adequate compensation for the victim’s detriment. Conclusion: In order to contemplate all the fundamental aspects of the valuation as close as possible to the real impact of the damage, so that the judge can define the relevant compensation, we propose a new methodology for the evaluation of permanent aesthetic damage, composed of four tables that address objective and subjective criteria

Keywords: Aesthetic damage, forensic medicine, civil responsibility, and repair.


Bibliographical references

  1. Almeida M. A parametrização da indenização por dano estético. Vol. 162, Revista Direito UNIFACS. 2014.
  2. Entralgo JF. La problemática del perjuicio estético: especial referencia a su valoración [Internet]. Revista de Responsabilidad Civil y Seguro. 2010. p. 9–44. Available from: http://www.asociacionabogadosrcs.org/revistas/rc%20abogados%2034.pdf
  3. Fernandes MM, Bouchardet FC, Tavares G de SV, Daruge Junior E, Paranhos LR. Forensic dentistry aspects related to aesthetic damages in court cases judged in Rio Grande do Sul State. Odonto. 2012;20(40):7–12.
  4. Criado del Río M. Valoración médico-legal del daño a la persona por responsabilid civil. Vol. 12, Fundación Mapfre Medicina. Madrid; 1994. p. 249–70.
  5. Cueto C. Valoración médica del daño corporal. Vol. 5, Masson. Barcelona; 1996. p. 107–30.
  6. Zavala M. Resarcimiento de daños. Daños a las personas. Integridad sicofísica. 2a. Buenos Aires; 1990.
  7. Magalhães T, Hamonet C. O dano pessoal. Vol. 10, Revista Portuguesa do Dano Corporal. Coimbra: Imprensa da Universidade de Coimbra; 2000. p. 4969.
  8. Bausili LP. Controversies in the assessment of bodily injury. Institute of Legal Medicine of Catalonia. First. Generalitat de Catalunya Centre d’Estudis Jurídics i Formació Especialitzada; 2014. 1–236 p.
  9. Crespo M. El resarcimiento del perjuicio estético. Consideraciones doctrinales y legales, a la luz del sistema de la Ley 30/1995. II Congreso Nacional de Responsabilidad Civil y Seguro. Córdoba; 2001.
  10. Villalobos N. ¿Incide el lugar de donde somos en nuestra elección estética y en la forma en que miramos un cuadro? Trabajo final de grado. Montevideo: UR. FP; 2014.