Original Article


How to cite: Santos MG, Rescigno AA, Aguiar LS, Miziara CSMG , Abe DM, Miziara ID. Pattern of oral–maxillofacial injuries stemming from interpersonal physical non-fatal violence: difference between sexes. Persp Med Legal Pericia Med. 2019; 4(3).


Submitted 07/05/2019
Accepted 08/26/2019

The authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.


Michelle Gomes dos Santos (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3574262858415165 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9390-3222

Arthur de Almeida Rescigno (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/7116860805437994 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4765-2888

Luan Salguero de Aguiar (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/4780070112183042 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2676-8494

Carmen Silvia Molleis Galego Miziara (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/6916238042273197 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4266-0117

Daniela Mieko Abe (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/9049604324657784 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0508-3098

Ivan Dieb Miziara (1)

Lattes: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3120760745952876 – ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7180-8873

(1) Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André-SP, Brasil. (Autor Principal)

E-mail: santos.gomes.michelle@gmail.com


Introduction: Interpersonal violence is a global health problem of epidemic proportions. Intimate partner violence is one of the most common forms of violence against women, while men are victims of violence outside the home environment, most of them, caused by unknown person. The facial region due to its anatomical peculiarities is a frequent target of lesions in the interpersonal violence. Objective: Showing the main bucomaxillofacial injuries due to interpersonal physical violence and to compare the results between the sexes. Methods: This study analyzed the odontolegial reports of victims of both sexes attended at the Legal Dentistry Center of IML in the city of São Paulo. Results: 148 reports were analyzed, 71 women (study group) and 77 men (control group). There was no difference between the groups: age; educational level; employability; and self-reported skin color. However, the women were victims of repeated aggressions caused by intimate partners (domestic violence), while men aggression occurred outside domestic environment by unknown person (p <0.001). The dental elements (fractured and avulsed teeth) were the most affected in both groups, with no differences between them (p=0,463); second in frequency were the labial contusion injuries. The instruments most commonly used by the aggressors were the natural ones and most of the injuries were considered mild, according to the Penal Code, although serious injuries were also present. Conclusion: Among the bucomaxillofacial structures, the teeth (fractures and avulsions) were the most damaged, with no difference between sexes.

Keywords: violence against women, domestic violence, intimate partner violence, maxillofacial injuries.

Bibliographical references

  1. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Relatório mundial sobre a prevenção da violência 2014. Núcleo de estudos da violência da Universidade de São Paulo 2015. Violência interpessoal – um desafio universal [citado em 12 jun. 2019]. Disponível em: file:///C:/Users/computador/Downloads/9789241564793_por%20(1).pdf
  2. Organização Mundial da Saúde. Prevenção da violência sexual e da violência pelo parceiro íntimo contra a mulher: ação e produção de evidência. Washington: OMS; 2010 [citado em 16 jun 2019]. Disponível em: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/44350/3/9789275716359_por.pdf
  3. Global Consultation on Violence and Health. Violence: a public health priority. Geneva, World Health Organization, 2002 (document WHO/EHA/ SPI.POA.2).
  4. Dahlberg LL, Krug EG. Violência: um problema global de saúde pública. Cien Saude 2007;11 (Suppl.): p1163-1178. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1413-81232006000500007
  5. Office for national statistics. Institute of the UK. Intimate personal violence and partner abuse [cited 2019 May 23]. Available from: https://www.ons.gov.uk
  6. Oliveira AF, Schraiber LB, França-Junior I, Ludermir AB, Portella AP, Diniz CS et al. Fatores associados à violência por parceiro íntimo em mulheres brasileiras. Rev Saúde Púb. 2009; 43(2): p299-311. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102009005000013
  7. Barros ÉN, Silva MA, Falbo Neto GH, Lucena SG, Ponzo L, Pimentel AP et al. Prevalência da violência contra a mulher por parceiro íntimo em regiões do Brasil. Cien Saúde Colet. 2016; 21(2): p591-598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0034-89102007000500014
  8. Brink O, Vesterby A, Jensen J. Injury. 1998; 29 (9): p705-709. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(98)00176-4
  9. Celbis O, Gökdoğan MR, Kaya M, Günes G. Review of forensic assessments of female referrals to the branch of legal medicine, Malatya region, Turkey–1996-2000. J Clin Forensic 2006; 13: p21-25. 10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.08.003
  10. Sheridan DJ, Nash KR. Acute injury patterns of intimate partner violence victims. Trauma Abuse. 2007; 8(3): p281-289. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838007303504
  11. Chrcanovic BR. Factors influencing the incidence of maxillofacial fractures. Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011; 16(1): p3-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10006-011-0280-y
  12. Lee KH. Interpersonal Violence and Facial Fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;67(9): p1878-1883. 1016/j.joms.2009.04.117
  13. Ferreira MC, Batista AM, Ferreira FO, Ramos-Jorge ML, Marques LS. Pattern of oral-maxillofacial trauma stemming from interpersonal physical violence and determinant factors. Dent Traumatol. 2014; 30: p.15-21. https://doi.org/10.1111/edt.12047
  14. Kieser J, Stephenson S, Liston PN, Tong DC, Langley JD. Serious facial fractures in New Zealand from 1979 to 1998. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2002;31: p206-209. https://doi.org/10.1054/ijom.2002.0208
  15. Caldas IM, Grams AC, Afonso A, Magalhães T. Oral injuries in victims involving intimate partner Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 221: p102-105. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.04.010
  16. Ministério da Saúde. Sistema de Informações de agravos e notificações (Sinan). Violência doméstica, sexual e/ou outras violências – Brasil [citado em 12 jun. 2019]. Disponível em: http://portalsinan.saude.gov.br/violencia-interpessoal-autoprovocada/57-doencas-e-agravos
  17. Silva JJL, Lima AAAS, Melo IFS, Maia RCL, Filho TRCP. Trauma facial: análise de 194 casos. Rev Bras Cir Plast. 2011;26: p37-41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1983-51752011000100009
  18. Yamamoto K, Matsusue Y, Horita S, Murakami K, Sugiura T, Kirita T. MaxillofacialFractures Associated with Interpersonal Violence. J Craniofac Surg. 2019;30(4): e312-e315. 1097/SCS.0000000000005306
  19. Schneider D, Turshen Political and Social Violence: Health Effects. Reference Module in Earth Systems and Environmental Sciences. 2014. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-409548-9.09048-5
  20. Leporace AAF, Junior WP, Rapoport A, Denardin OVP. Epidemiologic study of mandible fractures in a public hospital of São Paulo. Rev Col Bras Cir. 2009;36: p472-477. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-69912009000600002
  21. Boffano P, Roccia F, Zavattero E, Dediol E, Uglešić V, Kovačič Ž, et al. Assault-related maxillofacial injuries: the results from the European Maxillofacial Trauma (EURMAT) multicenter and prospective collaboration. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2015;119: p385-391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.oooo.2014.12.004
  22. Saukko P, Knight Bernard. Knight’s forensic pathology. Chapter 5. Head and spinal injuries. Great Britain London; 2004.